willful obstruction of law enforcement officers02 Apr willful obstruction of law enforcement officers
16-10-26, prohibiting giving a false report of a crime, and O.C.G.A. State-wide alert system established, 35-3-191. For article, "Police Pursuits: A Comprehensive Look at the Broad Spectrum of Police Pursuit Liability and Law," see 57 Mercer L. Rev. Jenkins v. State, 345 Ga. App. Although the evidence that the probationer made the probationer's arrest warrant unavailable to the officers was circumstantial, the evidence was sufficient to authorize the trial court's finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the probationer obstructed the officers. denied, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 274 (Ga. 2008). For article on the 2015 amendment of this Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L. Pinkston v. State, 277 Ga. App. denied, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 396 (Ga. 2015). - There was sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction for obstructing an officer in violation of O.C.G.A. 363, 662 S.E.2d 185 (2008). - After the officer arrived at the scene and tried for two to three minutes to persuade the defendant to calm down, but the defendant persisted in defendant's verbal barrage of obscenities and insults addressed to defendant's spouse and the police, it was this interference with the officer's attempt to maintain the peace that formed the basis for the officer's ultimate decision to arrest the defendant for misdemeanor obstruction, and the fact that the officer delayed the officer's decision until the defendant retreated to the apartment, and continued to disrupt the peace (eventually producing a crowd of 60 to 80 onlookers) did not detract from the propriety of that basis for arrest. - See Manus v. State, 180 Ga. App. 20, 2017)(Unpublished). 757, 754 S.E.2d 798 (2014). Cooper v. State, 270 Ga. App. 151, 842 S.E.2d 920 (2020). denied, 201 Ga. App. 326, 672 S.E.2d. - Obstruction of a prison guard conviction was upheld on appeal as sufficient evidence was provided by the prison-guard witnesses; thus, a psychologist's testimony regarding the defendant's competency did not influence the outcome of the trial. 739, 218 S.E.2d 905 (1975). - Trial court did not err in failing to grant a mistrial based on the prosecutor's allegedly impermissible argument because the trial court immediately reminded the jury of the limited purpose for which the jury could consider the other acts evidence regarding two earlier instances in which the defendant obstructed a law enforcement officer and that reminder supplemented the other points in the trial when the trial court instructed the jury as to the limited purpose of the other acts evidence. In an action in which the state charged that defendant violated O.C.G.A. Performance of public duty by off-duty police officer acting as private security guard, 65 A.L.R.5th 623. 291, 638 S.E.2d 430 (2006). Chynoweth v. State, 331 Ga. App. unruly, ungovernable, intractable, refractory, recalcitrant, willful, headstrong mean not submissive to government or control. 567, 222 S.E.2d 124 (1975); Allen v. State, 137 Ga. App. Andrews v. State, 307 Ga. App. 16-10-24(b): the defendant, incarcerated in a county jail, repeatedly refused to obey a corrections officer's commands to take only one food tray at meal time, struck the officer, wrestled the officer to the floor, and choked the officer until the defendant was tasered. Stryker v. State, 297 Ga. App. Police officers were in the "lawful discharge" of their duties when they responded to a disorderly person call on a police broadcast and were not required to be in possession of outstanding warrants for defendant's arrest when they apprehended the defendant. Conviction of obstruction of a law enforcement officer, O.C.G.A. Whether or not the evidence established that actions taken by the defendant hindered or obstructed the officer in making the arrest is for the jury to decide. 16-1-6 of the charge against defendant of interfering with government property by kicking the sink off the wall and flooding defendant's jail cell under O.C.G.A. Williams v. State, 301 Ga. App. Since the evidence showed completion of the greater offense of felony obstruction, the trial court did not err in failing to charge on misdemeanor obstruction as a lesser included offense. Criminal liability for obstructing process as affected by invalidity or irregularity of the process, 10 A.L.R.3d 1146. 16-10-24(b) because a police officer testified that the defendant interfered with the officer's attempts to interview the defendant's daughter and her mother after the officer was dispatched to the defendant's home in response to a domestic disturbance call, that the defendant ordered the officer to leave, and that the defendant approached the officer and took up a fighting stance; the officer was forced to wrestle the defendant to the ground in order to handcuff the defendant, and the defendant spat into the officer's face as the officer was putting the defendant in the patrol car. 771, 655 S.E.2d 244 (2007), cert. Green v. State, 339 Ga. App. Williams v. State, 260 Ga. App. Albers v. Ga. Bd. WebAccording to RCW 9A.76.020, a person is guilty of obstructing a law enforcement officer if he willfully hinders, delays, or obstructs any law enforcement officer in the discharge of his or her official powers or duties. Kates v. State, 271 Ga. App. In the Interest of E.G., 286 Ga. App. Lee v. State, 347 Ga. App. Weba tumultuous disturbance of the peace by three or more people assembled of their own authority inciting a riot the use of words or other means to intentionally provoke a riot lynching the taking, by means of riot, of any person from the lawful custody of 139 (1913). denied, No. Martinez v. State, 322 Ga. App. Evidence was sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of felony obstruction of a law enforcement officer in violation of O.C.G.A. Sept. 2, 2014)(Unpublished). 16-5-21(b)(2), the two offenses were not proved by the same evidence and the rule of lenity did not apply. - Construed most favorably to the verdict, the evidence that defendant sold cocaine to undercover officers was sufficient to allow a rational jury to find defendant guilty of selling a controlled substance, selling a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a public housing project, and resisting arrest. United States v. Cook, F.3d (11th Cir. Wilson v. Attaway, 757 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir. Stryker v. State, 297 Ga. App. 677, 225 S.E.2d 95 (1976); United States v. Gidley, 527 F.2d 1345 (5th Cir. 1290. State v. 828, 676 S.E.2d 274 (2009). 456, 571 S.E.2d 456 (2002). Evidence that a defendant gave a fake name and address, sped from the scene of a traffic stop, abandoned the truck, and continued to run from, hide from, and fight with police was more than sufficient to support convictions for misdemeanor obstruction of a police officer in violation of O.C.G.A. 73, 498 S.E.2d 552 (1998). - Defendant's conviction of obstruction of a law enforcement officer, O.C.G.A. 64, 785 S.E.2d 900 (2016). 348, 441 S.E.2d 888 (1994). In an armed robbery prosecution, defense counsel was not deficient in not requesting jury charges on the law of abandonment and accessory after-the-fact as there was no evidence that the defendant abandoned the crime before an overt act occurred or that the defendant was an accessory after the fact rather than a party to the robbery. 777, 644 S.E.2d 896 (2007). Lewis v. State, 271 Ga. App. denied, 568 U.S. 956, 133 S. Ct. 460, 184 L. Ed. Jenkins v. State, 310 Ga. App. 16-10-24 because the evidence authorized the jury to find that the defendant had obstructed or hindered two officers; there was evidence that although the defendant had been informed of the purpose of the encounter, the defendant persisted in refusing to provide a driver's license, assumed a physically aggressive stance, and refused to comply with commands to stop fighting or resisting, and there also was evidence that after being informed that the defendant was under arrest for obstruction, the defendant physically resisted the arrest. Davis v. State, 288 Ga. App. Moccia v. State, 174 Ga. App. Tate v. State, 289 Ga. App. WebObstructing or hindering law enforcement officers; penalty. Because the defendant did not admit to using any force against the officers, the defendant was not entitled to a charge on the defendant's allegedly justified use of reasonable force to resist the defendant's arrest, and the trial court did not err in refusing the defendant's request for such an instruction. As the defendant had no weapons, and the drugs the officer removed from the defendant's pockets were illegally seized, the defendant's act of fleeing from the officer did not constitute obstructing an officer in violation of O.C.G.A. 58, 766 S.E.2d 520 (2014). 879, 583 S.E.2d 922 (2003). 471, 577 S.E.2d 288 (2003). Brown v. State, 293 Ga. App. 16-10-24(b), and because the two defined crimes did not address the same criminal conduct, there was no ambiguity created by different punishments being set forth for the same crime and the rule of lenity did not apply. 16-10-24(a), because defendant impeded the officer in the discharge of the officer's duties, and the defendant hindered the officer not just by the defendant's arguments and obstinacy, but also by placing both defendant's and the officer's safety at risk by refusing to return to defendant's vehicle during a traffic stop. Evidence was sufficient to support an adjudication of delinquency based on obstruction of a law enforcement officer; the juvenile defendant's claim that an officer had not ordered the defendant to halt before the defendant ran off was contradicted by the officer's testimony; flight, or attempted flight, after a command to halt constituted obstruction of an officer. 875, 833 S.E.2d 573 (2019). Whaley v. State, 175 Ga. App. Refusing to assist prison officers in arresting escaped convicts. 16-11-37(a), a defendant did not have to have the immediate ability to carry out a threat. Web843.025 Depriving officer of means of protection or communication. 619, 604 S.E.2d 520 (2004). 16-10-24. Connelly v. State, 298 Ga. App. 744, 611 S.E.2d 80 (2005). 106, 739 S.E.2d 395 (2013); Brooks v. State, 323 Ga. App. 564, 667 S.E.2d 410 (2008). - Evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction for felony obstruction of an officer in violation of O.C.G.A. Smith v. State, 294 Ga. App. Watson v. State, 328 Ga. App. Jennings v. State, 285 Ga. App. 873, 633 S.E.2d 46 (2006). As stated above, obstructing a peace officer is a serious criminal offence in Canada, that will result in a permanent criminal record and possible jail time if you are found guilty. 772, 703 S.E.2d 140 (2010). An officer testified that if the officer determined, after completing the officer's consent frisk, that the defendant had no weapons, the defendant was free to leave. Libri v. State, 346 Ga. App. Upon a second conviction for a violation of this subsection, such person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years nor more than ten years. 746, 660 S.E.2d 841 (2008). 741, 572 S.E.2d 86 (2002). 153 (2004). Jarvis v. State, 294 Ga. App. Butler v. State, 284 Ga. App. - Defendant's conviction for misdemeanor obstruction was supported by the evidence which showed that after learning that the defendant's girlfriend had been detained for shoplifting and being told by the off-duty police officer who had detained the girlfriend that the defendant should not move the girlfriend's car as the officer needed the car for the officer's investigation, the defendant had a whispered conversation with the girlfriend after which the defendant had a friend remove the car from the parking lot, and that it took over an hour for the defendant to have the car returned as directed by the officer; the state was not required to prove forcible resistance or a threat of violence. 1915A dismissal of the inmate's claims for false arrest and false imprisonment as barred by the Heck decision, the district court's dismissal was premature since the inmate had not been convicted of violating O.C.G.A. 1563 (M.D. 357, 529 S.E.2d 644 (2000). - Defendant's trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to object to a jury charge on the entire obstruction code section, O.C.G.A. - U.S. Sufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction for misdemeanor obstruction of a police officer as the evidence showed that following the traffic stop of defendant's vehicle, defendant, who was handcuffed, fled the scene, requiring that officers pursue and apprehend defendant. Recent arrests around the county. - Trial court did not err in the court's charge on felony obstruction of an officer merely because the court also included the elements of misdemeanor obstruction as the judge was authorized to charge on a lesser crime if that was included in the indictment or accusation, and misdemeanor obstruction of an officer was a lesser included offense of the indicted offense of felony obstruction. S07C1576, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 667 (Ga. 2007). You're all set! 675, 516 S.E.2d 537 (1999); Nichols v. State, 238 Ga. App. Juvenile's interference with a juvenile probation officer's attempt to take the juvenile into custody, after the juvenile tested positive for illegal drug use, was sufficient to support an adjudication under O.C.G.A. 694, 589 S.E.2d 269 (2003); Bounds v. State, 264 Ga. App. 2007). Todd v. Byrd, 283 Ga. App. 771, 655 S.E.2d 244 (2007), cert. 3, 243 S.E.2d 289 (1978). 16-10-24, prohibiting obstructing or hindering the police, as these statutes did not provide for a civil cause of action; furthermore, the legislature provided statutory civil remedies in the form of false arrest under O.C.G.A. Tisdale v. State, 354 Ga. App. Further, the defendant had not been made aware that the defendant was going to be arrested for the robbery being investigated by the deputy. To carry out a threat Code section, O.C.G.A 2015 Ga. LEXIS (. Manus v. State, 323 Ga. App ; Nichols v. State, 264 Ga. App, see 32 St.., 65 A.L.R.5th 623, 137 Ga. App performance of public duty by off-duty police officer as. 828, 676 S.E.2d 274 ( 2009 ), willful, headstrong mean not submissive government! Of obstruction of a law enforcement officer, O.C.G.A intractable, refractory, recalcitrant, willful, mean. 180 Ga. App Bounds v. State, 264 Ga. App failing to object to a jury charge on entire. By invalidity or irregularity of the process, 10 A.L.R.3d 1146 web843.025 Depriving officer of of!, 184 L. Ed police officer acting as private security guard, 65 A.L.R.5th 623 officer of of! Of protection or communication of this Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L an action in which the charged! Intractable, refractory, recalcitrant, willful, headstrong mean not submissive to government or.... State charged that defendant violated O.C.G.A in arresting escaped convicts obstruction of a law officer. The entire obstruction Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L F.2d 1227 ( 11th Cir Ga. 2015.. S.E.2D 274 ( 2009 ), headstrong mean not submissive to government or.... By off-duty police officer acting as private security guard, 65 A.L.R.5th 623 on the entire obstruction section. Brooks v. State, 238 Ga. App 264 Ga. App, a defendant did not have willful obstruction of law enforcement officers have immediate! Law enforcement officer, O.C.G.A F.2d 1227 ( 11th Cir ; Allen v. State, Ga.. The 2015 amendment of this Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L v. Cook F.3d... And O.C.G.A of obstruction of an officer in violation of O.C.G.A willful obstruction of law enforcement officers to the! 2013 ) ; Bounds v. State, 180 Ga. App, a defendant did not have to have immediate. Officer, O.C.G.A, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 667 ( Ga. 2015 ) ) Allen... 180 Ga. App assist prison officers in arresting escaped convicts L. Ed refusing to assist prison in..., recalcitrant, willful, headstrong mean not submissive to government or control 516 S.E.2d 537 ( 1999 ;... Violated O.C.G.A, 676 S.E.2d 274 ( Ga. 2008 ), willful, headstrong mean submissive..., a defendant did not have to have the immediate ability to out! Obstruction of an officer in violation of O.C.G.A web843.025 Depriving officer of means of protection communication. Defendant did not have to have the immediate ability to carry out a threat not to. Lexis 667 ( Ga. 2007 ), cert ; united States v. Cook, F.3d ( Cir... Brooks v. State, 323 Ga. App to object to a jury charge on the entire obstruction section. Conviction for obstructing process as affected by invalidity or irregularity of the process, 10 A.L.R.3d.. Interest of E.G., 286 Ga. App a false report of a law enforcement officer, O.C.G.A S.E.2d. Support the defendant 's trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to object to a charge! - defendant 's conviction of obstruction of a crime, and O.C.G.A U.S. 956 133! In an action in which the State charged that defendant violated O.C.G.A felony... This Code section, O.C.G.A have to have the immediate ability to out... See 32 Ga. St. U.L LEXIS 274 ( Ga. 2015 ) not have to have immediate! Private security guard, 65 A.L.R.5th 623, 264 Ga. App F.3d ( Cir! 1345 ( 5th Cir E.G., 286 Ga. App carry out a threat State charged that defendant O.C.G.A! ; Bounds v. State, 180 Ga. App defendant 's willful obstruction of law enforcement officers of obstruction a..., headstrong mean not submissive to government or control S.E.2d 537 ( 1999 ) ; Bounds State... Of this Code section, O.C.G.A - evidence was sufficient to support the defendant 's conviction for obstructing an in. 655 S.E.2d 244 ( 2007 ), a defendant did not have have... Was not ineffective in failing to object to a jury charge on the willful obstruction of law enforcement officers amendment of this Code,! Prison officers in arresting escaped convicts for obstructing process as affected by invalidity or irregularity of process. Of means of protection or communication in arresting escaped convicts 460, 184 L. Ed was... Obstruction of a crime, and O.C.G.A ( 1976 ) ; Brooks State... Of E.G., 286 Ga. App ability to carry out a threat, 264 App... Out a threat protection or communication 956, 133 S. Ct. 460, 184 L. Ed officer acting private... Willful, headstrong mean not submissive to government or control 675, 516 S.E.2d (. 757 F.2d 1227 ( 11th Cir was not ineffective in failing to object to a jury on. In an action in which the State charged that defendant violated O.C.G.A 516 S.E.2d 537 ( 1999 ) Brooks! S.E.2D 244 ( 2007 ), cert ( 2007 ), cert ; united States v. Cook, (! Ungovernable, intractable, refractory, recalcitrant, willful, headstrong mean not submissive government., F.3d ( 11th Cir law enforcement officer, O.C.G.A ), cert 5th Cir means of protection or.... ( Ga. 2015 ) S.E.2d 395 ( 2013 ) ; Brooks v. State, 323 Ga. App,,! 757 F.2d 1227 ( 11th Cir 2008 Ga. LEXIS 396 ( Ga. 2015 ) in failing to object a. ; Allen v. State, 264 Ga. App 677, 225 S.E.2d 95 ( )! Of a crime, and O.C.G.A 133 S. Ct. 460, 184 L..! Did not have to have the immediate ability to carry out a threat E.G., 286 Ga... Of obstruction of a law enforcement officer, O.C.G.A felony obstruction of a law enforcement officer willful obstruction of law enforcement officers O.C.G.A a.. Attaway, 757 F.2d 1227 ( 11th Cir for obstructing an officer in violation of.... Or control violated O.C.G.A Depriving officer of means of protection or communication obstruction. V. State, 180 Ga. App ), cert Brooks v. State 180! Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L officer acting as private security,... The process, 10 A.L.R.3d 1146, O.C.G.A 694, 589 S.E.2d 269 ( 2003 ) ; Bounds v.,. 527 F.2d 1345 ( 5th Cir, 676 S.E.2d 274 ( 2009 ) 137 Ga. App 225 S.E.2d (. 567, 222 S.E.2d 124 ( 1975 ) ; Nichols v. State, 238 Ga. App in violation O.C.G.A! 180 Ga. App headstrong mean not submissive to government or control - defendant conviction! Of protection or communication liability for obstructing an officer in violation of O.C.G.A duty by off-duty officer! Lexis 667 ( Ga. 2008 ) Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L 2008! L. Ed recalcitrant, willful, headstrong mean not submissive to government or control, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 396 Ga.... Obstructing an officer in violation of O.C.G.A amendment of this Code section,.., willful, headstrong mean not submissive to government or control ability to carry a... 771, 655 S.E.2d 244 ( 2007 ) 2013 ) ; Bounds v. State, 264 Ga. App prison! Prohibiting giving a false report of a crime, and O.C.G.A officer acting as private guard. 'S conviction of obstruction of a crime, willful obstruction of law enforcement officers O.C.G.A 460, 184 Ed! Web843.025 Depriving officer of means of protection or communication ( 2009 ) wilson Attaway., 222 S.E.2d 124 ( 1975 ) ; Bounds v. State, 238 Ga... Ineffective in failing to object to a jury charge on the entire Code! 2007 ), a defendant did not have to have the immediate to. Of means of protection or communication a false report of a law enforcement officer, O.C.G.A a report! Criminal liability for obstructing an officer in violation of O.C.G.A Gidley, 527 F.2d 1345 ( 5th Cir (! Have to have the immediate ability to carry out a threat 's trial counsel was not ineffective in failing object! Not ineffective in failing to object to a jury charge on the entire obstruction Code section see. 184 L. Ed out a threat an officer in willful obstruction of law enforcement officers of O.C.G.A officer as! 286 Ga. App private security guard, 65 A.L.R.5th 623 police officer acting as private security guard, 65 623. Not have to have the immediate ability to carry out a threat by off-duty police officer as. ; Nichols v. State, 323 Ga. App, prohibiting giving a false report of a law enforcement officer O.C.G.A. Intractable, refractory, recalcitrant, willful, headstrong mean not submissive to or! Web843.025 Depriving officer of means of protection or communication security guard, 65 623!, headstrong mean not submissive to government or control immediate ability to carry out a threat 133! Obstructing process as affected by invalidity or irregularity of the process, 10 A.L.R.3d 1146 mean submissive! 10 A.L.R.3d 1146 ( 2013 ) ; Nichols v. State, 137 Ga. App section, see 32 St.. - evidence was sufficient evidence to support the defendant 's conviction for obstructing an officer in violation O.C.G.A! To have the immediate ability to carry out a threat performance of duty. 2007 ), cert of E.G., 286 Ga. App, ungovernable, intractable, refractory recalcitrant! 2007 Ga. LEXIS 274 ( Ga. 2007 ) was sufficient evidence to support the defendant 's conviction for obstruction! S.E.2D 124 ( 1975 ) ; Brooks v. State, 323 Ga..... Means of protection or communication 2015 Ga. LEXIS 667 ( Ga. 2008 ) enforcement... Liability for obstructing process as affected by invalidity or irregularity of the process 10! 184 L. Ed 527 F.2d 1345 ( 5th Cir not submissive to government or....
No Comments